European Regional Development Fund

About this article

Publish date:


Overall rating:
1 2 3 4 5

Your rating
Login to rate this article.

Should you reinvest your dividend?

Published 7 years ago by BlackDigits

Published on the Times of Malta

Ever wondered whether you should reinvest your dividends? Or were you ever at a loss between choosing to receive cash or new shares when a scrip dividend is offered?

According to a study carried out by Professors Dimson et al of the London Business School, if you had invested $1 in US Stocks in 1900 and spent all your dividends, your stock portfolio would have grown to $198 by 2000. However, if you had reinvested all your dividends, your stock portfolio would have been worth $16,979!

In light of this study, reinvesting one’s dividend seems to be the best approach if the investor is holding his investments as a savings or retirement plan. However reinvesting dividends blindly is as dangerous as buying shares without carrying out a diligent analysis.

Benjamin Graham, the first proponent of value investing and a very influential person in Warren Buffet’s life, sets one standard rule on profits retained by a company. For every dollar increase in profits retained, one dollar of market capitalisation must be created for owners. To understand this better one can by way of analogy think of a depositor that does not withdraw interest earned on a term deposit. The value of the deposit increases by that interest saved and likewise the market value of a company that retains its profits should at least increase by the value of the profit retained.

To Warren Buffett, the ability to use retained earnings wisely is a sign of good company management. If management cannot do any better with earnings then the wise decision would be to pay them out.

In the next section of this article, we will analyse the local listed market from this perspective. Table 1 below summarises our results:

Company name


Increase in Equity*

Change in market cap**

6pm Holdings plc




Bank of Valletta plc



FIMBank plc




HSBC Bank Malta plc



Lombard Bank Malta plc



Malta International Airport plc



MaltaPost plc



Medserv plc



Middlesea Insurance plc



MIDI plc



RS2 Software Plc



Santumas Shareholdings plc



Simonds Farsons Cisk plc



  Table 1



Ideally this study would have covered a long time horizon. However, the peaks reached in 2007 and the market bottom in 2009 skewed our results. To mitigate this ‘noise’, we carried our analysis by comparing the shareholders equity of listed companies between the end of 2008 and that published in the most recent financial statements. We then compared this movement with the change in market capitalisation between April 2009 (which was the bottom of the market) and today.

*Increase in equity between 2008 and the most recent financial statements. If the company was listed after this date, the period covered starts running from the listing date. Shareholders' equity excludes non-controlling interest.

**Change in market cap between Apr 09 and the date of writing of this article (25 January 2013).

This table only shows companies whose equity increased over the period under review since the goal of this study is to investigate whether equity increases gave rise to at least a corresponding increase in market value.


Clearly, one euro of equity accumulated did not always increase the market cap by one euro or more. Out of 13 companies, only 7 companies registered a larger increase in market cap when compared to the amount of equity accumulated. Maybe this is why the market has a stubborn habit of valuing distributed earnings more generously than profits retained.

We make a number of key observations on the basis of this small study. Firstly, an investor must look at fundamental indicators. It does not make financial sense to reinvest profits in a company that is earning a low return on equity and one must be cautious when stocks are selling at high P/E ratios.

Secondly, the investor should look at the relationship between profits retained and market capitalisation. Graham and Buffet advice to avoid stocks whose profits retained do not give rise to at least a corresponding increase in market cap.

Thirdly, dividend is key. In principle, we agree that the value of a company should reflect its ability to generate earnings and not how these earnings are distributed. However if earnings retained are not always successfully translated into market cap, the dividend yield (and any expected growth in dividend) may be more important than you otherwise would have thought.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely of the authors and do not reflect the views of the users of the website, its affiliates or of any financial institution. This article is published solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as a personal recommendation, a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.

Stock markets are volatile and subject to fluctuations which cannot be reasonably foreseen. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. The authors do not accept any liability for any loss or damage arising out of the use of all or any part thereof and no representation or warranty is provided in respect of the reliability of the information contained in this report.


Share with your friends


  • ciajoe (7 years ago)

    Table 1 missing companies
    This is a very interesting article and more information / knowledge is required ... 1 reply
  • Login to post your comments